The Professionalisation of Parenting: Balancing Evidence, Emotion, and Everyday Reality

In recent years, parenting has undergone a profound transformation. What was once a private, instinct-driven, and largely community-informed experience has become something far more scrutinised, systematised, and increasingly professionalised. From podcasts and parenting “influencers” to evidence-based frameworks and emotional coaching courses, parents today are navigating a crowded landscape of advice, opinions, and expectations. While this evolution has brought many benefits, it has also introduced complexity and pressure that deserve thoughtful unpacking.

The Dimensions of Parenting

Parenting can be understood through two key dimensions: parental control (which includes both behavioural and psychological aspects) and parental support (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). Parental control involves efforts to guide or regulate a child's behaviour using rewards and consequences and is generally seen as beneficial to a child’s development when applied correctly at the exclusion of physical punishment. In contrast, psychological control involves attempts to influence a child's thoughts and emotions, which research suggests usually has a harmful effect on their development. Parental support encompasses involvement, acceptance, emotional availability, warmth, and responsiveness, that shape the emotional quality of the parent-child relationship and are believed to have a positive impact.

In relation to these two dimensions, pioneer of parenting research, Diana Baumrind (1967, 1971) introduced three parenting archetypes: authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive, while neglectful was a fourth later added by Maccaboy and Martin (1983).

Parenting Style	Characteristics	Parent Behaviour	Child Outcomes
Authoritative	High responsiveness, high demandingness	Sets clear rules; enforces with warmth and reasoning; encourages independence	Confident, responsible, socially skilled, high self-esteem
Authoritarian	Low responsiveness, high demandingness	Strict rules; expects obedience; little warmth; uses punishment	Obedient, but less happy, lower self-esteem, possible social issues, internalising problems
Permissive	High responsiveness, low demandingness	Very lenient; avoids confrontation; acts more like a friend than a parent	Impulsive, poor self-regulation, egocentric, may struggle academically, externalising problems.
Neglectful (Uninvolved)	Low responsiveness, low demandingness	Indifferent; uninvolved; minimal communication or support	Low self-esteem, poor academic performance, antisocial behaviour

Parenting Across Decades

The effectiveness of parenting styles is highly contextual, shaped by cultural norms and societal changes. Most parents do not strictly follow one style, but rather move fluidly between styles based on circumstances. Below is a brief historical overview of parenting trends in Western cultures:

Post-WWII: The Authoritarian Era

After World War II, parenting in Western cultures was predominantly authoritarian. Children were expected to be obedient, quiet (“seen and not heard”), and compliant under rigid, top-down discipline. Communication was often one-sided, exemplified by phrases like, “Because I said so!”

While many adults today defend this style as harmless or even beneficial, research shows otherwise. These lessons were often fear-based (extrinsically motivated), temporary, and context-specific, and did not teach emotional regulation or intrinsic values, only the need to avoid punishment when adults were watching.

1960s–1980s: Free-Range and Permissive Trends

The rise of ‘free-range parenting’ in the 1960s to 1980s emphasized self-expression, independence, and unstructured play. This era was marked by less parental oversight, with children encouraged to explore, often with minimal supervision (“be home by dark”).

While these trends align with permissive parenting, many households still maintained strict discipline, indicating a hybrid of permissive and authoritarian styles. The shift also reflected broader social changes, such as increased workforce participation by both parents.

1990s–2000s: Emotional Responsiveness and ‘Helicopter’ Parenting

During this period, parenting became increasingly child-centred, with growing awareness of emotional intelligence, mental health, and developmental psychology. Parents sought to be more emotionally responsive and nurturing, but often became overinvolved.

This gave rise to the ‘helicopter parent’, hovering protectively to prevent failure or discomfort. The cultural push for inclusivity and affirmation led to the ‘medals for everyone’ mentality, potentially undermining resilience, risk-taking, and distress tolerance in children.

2010s–Present: Striving for Balance Amid Conflicting Advice

The past decade has seen a widespread push for authoritative parenting, as it consistently yields the most positive outcomes. However, the explosion of parenting advice from social media influencers and pseudo-experts has created confusion.

Some newer totalitarian approaches advocate for no discipline or purely emotion-focused strategies which, when misapplied, can hinder development of self-regulation and adaptability. These trends sometimes reflect the mistaken belief that children are simply ‘little adults,’ neglecting their unique developmental needs.

At the same time, rising parental anxiety, societal judgment, and information overload have left many parents feeling overwhelmed, inadvertently impacting children’s well-being.

The Upside: Evidence-Based Parenting Practices

At its best, the professionalisation of parenting has empowered caregivers with access to research-informed strategies that foster emotional security, cognitive development, and behavioural regulation in children. We know more than ever about brain development, attachment theory, and the long-term impacts of trauma and neglect. This knowledge, when translated effectively, can help parents move beyond outdated or harmful approaches and toward creating nurturing, safe, and responsive environments.

The Downside: Pseudo-Expertise and Paralysis by Opinion

However, not all advice is created equal. The same digital platforms that have democratised access to information have also become breeding grounds for pseudo-experts, oversimplified soundbites, and conflicting messages. One influencer may preach permissiveness masked as “gentle parenting,” while another condemns any boundary-setting as “authoritarian.” For parents genuinely trying to do right by their children, this deluge of contradictory guidance can feel overwhelming and deeply disempowering.

This environment has contributed to a growing fear among parents: the fear of judgement. Parents increasingly report anxiety about being "watched" — by other parents, by family, by strangers online — and fear being labelled as "too soft," "too harsh," "too reactive," or "not engaged enough." Parenting, once grounded in personal values and family context, now often feels like a public performance under constant review.

The Misuse and Overgeneralisation of Emotional Coaching

One particular area where this conflict comes to a head is in the widespread and sometimes inappropriate application of emotional coaching. Emotional literacy is undeniably important. Helping children identify, name, and manage their feelings is central to healthy development. Yet problems arise when emotional coaching is misapplied as a one-size-fits-all intervention, particularly during episodes of misbehaviour or tantrums.

Emotional validation has become so emphasised in some parenting circles that it can crowd out other critical components of discipline, such as boundaries and appropriate consequences. For example, attempting to "emotion coach" a child mid-tantrum whilst they are dysregulated and cognitively unavailable can lead to frustration for both parent and child. Worse, it may inadvertently reinforce disruptive behaviour if clear behavioural expectations and boundaries are not also being communicated and upheld. Similarly, verbose redirection (aka lectures) despite whether they are well-intentioned, can have the opposite effect on outcomes, due to the child’s cognitive incapacity and desire to escape.

The key lies in balance. Children need to be emotionally seen and heard and they need structure, predictability, and secure limits. Secure attachment doesn’t mean permissiveness. In fact, boundaries enhance emotional safety by signalling to children that the adult is in charge, attuned, and able to manage the environment. Emotional coaching, when used appropriately and at the right time, is a powerful tool  however when it replaces the foundational parenting work of setting clear, loving boundaries, the child can feel anxious and lost.

Parenting in Context: One Size Does Not Fit All

Crucially, all of this must be understood within context. No parenting framework no matter how "evidence-based" can account for every child’s temperament, every family’s cultural background, every neurodiverdivergence, or every socioeconomic reality. What works well in one home may be ineffective or even harmful in another.

Professionalised parenting can sometimes forget this. In its desire for universal “best practices,” it can unintentionally dismiss the importance of lived experience, cultural wisdom, and adaptive flexibility. Even if the parenting advice is specific to neurodiversity. This can lead to parents internalising unnecessary guilt or shame when they cannot adhere perfectly to a model that may not fit their child or circumstances.

The Unspoken Essentials: Self-Compassion and Shared Humanity

Perhaps the most essential and most neglected parenting tool is self-compassion. Parenting is hard. It is full of failure, repair, and moments of deep uncertainty. As a parent and psychologist, I can attest to the force of guilt and self-doubt. Guilt is part of the territory, not a sign of incompetence. All parents yell sometimes – psychologists included! All parents miss cues. All parents get it wrong. What matters is not perfection, but repair and consistency.

Kindness to ourselves and to others is foundational. When we extend empathy to other parents navigating their own messes, we create a culture that recognises effort over perfection. When we allow ourselves to be human, our children learn that being human is okay.

Parenting will never be an exact science, nor should it be. It is relational, contextual, and deeply personal. Evidence can guide us, emotional insight can enrich us, but neither should replace the intuitive, responsive, sometimes messy reality of showing up, day after day, for our children.

Final Thoughts: Towards a More Compassionate Culture of Parenting

We are living in an age where parenting is no longer a private act and that brings both opportunity and risk. The professionalisation of parenting has offered valuable frameworks, language, and research to support families. But it has also created space for overreach, oversimplification, and unnecessary pressure.

As we move forward, let us embrace a more balanced, forgiving, and nuanced culture of parenting. One that honours evidence without dogma, values emotional literacy without losing sight of boundaries, and recognises that every parent is doing the best they can often with far less support than they need.

Most importantly, let us remember that children don’t need perfect parents. They need present, attuned, and human ones.

References that contributed to this article

Antony, Jiji & Vadakedom, Suresh. (2017). PARENTING AND ITS INFLUENCE ON CHILD BEHAVIOUR. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 4. 5806-5811. 10.18410/jebmh/2017/1169.

Babu, N., Fatima, M., & Arora, M. (2024). The dynamic nature of parenting practices: a qualitative enquiry of parenting adolescents during COVID-19. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1309786. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1309786

Baumrind D. Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development. 1966;37:887–907. doi: 10.2307/1126611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Baumrind D. Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behaviour. Genetic Psychology Monographs. 1967;75:43–88. doi: 10.1037/h0024919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology. 1971;4:1–103. doi: 10.1037/h0030372. [DOI] [Google Scholar

Breiner, H., Ford, M.A. and Gadsden, V.L. (2016) Parenting matters: Supporting parents of children ages 0-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Jessup (2019) The psychology behind different types of parenting styles, Jessup University. Available at: https://jessup.edu/blog/academic-success/the-psychology-behind-different-types-of-parenting-styles/ (Accessed: 17 September 2025).

Kuppens, S., & Ceulemans, E. (2019). Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept. Journal of child and family studies, 28(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x

Parenting styles and their evolution: Old, new, recent studies and recommendations (no date) Conscious Mommy Community with Bryana Kappadakunnel, LMFT. Available at: https://www.consciousmommy.com/post/parenting-styles-and-their-evolution (Accessed: 17 September 2025).